Informational lobbying under the shadow of political pressure
نویسندگان
چکیده
We examine the incentives of an interest group to provide verifiable policy-relevant information to a political decision-maker and to exert political pressure on her. We show that both lobbying instruments are interdependent. In our view information provision is a risky attempt to affect the politician’s beliefs about the desirability of the lobby’s objective. The constraints governing informational lobbying determine a specific lottery available. The circumstances under which political pressure can be applied specify the lobby’s valuation of different beliefs of the politician and, thus, her attitude toward risk. The combination of lotteries available and induced risk preference determines the optimal lobbying behavior. Our approach gives a novel explanation for the fact that interest groups often try to provide information credibly. We identify several factors that induce risk proclivity (and thus information provision). We also show that the availability of political pressure might have a deterrence effect on information provision. This ‘shadow of political pressure’ might impede information provision at all or induce a complementary relationship between both lobbying instruments. JEL Classification: C72; D72.
منابع مشابه
Lobby or Contribute? The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms' Political Strategies
This paper theoretically and empirically studies the impact of corporate governance level on firms’ choice in two political strategies: lobbying and making political contributions. The theoretical model implies that managers with short-run personal interest, prefer making political contributions; while shareholders caring about firms’ longterm success, are willing to do informational lobbying. ...
متن کاملInformational Lobbying and Agenda Distortion
This paper challenges the prevailing view that strict informational lobbying (in the absence of political contributions and evidence distortion) leads to better policy outcomes. Key to our analysis is the fact that policymakers are constrained on the number of issues they can address, which forces them to prioritize issues. We show how interest groups advocating reform on less-important issues ...
متن کاملInformational Lobbying and Competition for Access
There is substantial evidence that political contributions buy access to politicians. This paper incorporates access into a model of informational lobbying, then uses the access framework to analyze the impact of contribution limits on policy outcomes and representative citizen welfare. In the competition for access model, interest groups provide contributions to a politician and those that pro...
متن کاملCentralized decision making against informed lobbying∗
We re-address the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making of local policies when policy makers are subject to capture. In particular, we consider the case where lobbies have private information about their ability to influence. We find a new informational effect in the political game under centralized structures that gives the policy maker additional bargaining power aga...
متن کاملStructural Power and Public Policy: A Signaling Model of Business Lobbying in Democratic Capitalism
This paper develops a signaling model of corporate lobbying in democratic capitalist societies to analyze the conditions that lead to a powerful political position of business. Proceeding from the traditional dichotomy of structural economic determinants versus business’ political action, our model predicts the conditions under which elected political decisionmakers modify their policy pledges ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 30 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008